The Iowa Pork Producers Association (IPPA) appealed the district court's decisions that denied their motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissed the case. The IPPA challenged Prop. 12, arguing it discriminates against interstate commerce in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause. The district court ruled against IPPA, and the appeal was reviewed by the Ninth Circuit. The court upheld the dismissal, stating Prop. 12 does not discriminate against out-of-state pork producers. It requires all pork sold in California to meet specific animal confinement standards, irrespective of the product's origin. The court dismissed IPPA's Privileges and Immunities Clause claim, noting Prop. 12 applies equally to all businesses. Lastly, the court determined Prop. 12 does not conflict with the federal Packers and Stockyards Act, as it does not favor in-state producers. Original article written by Chris Moore on Meatingplace.com Prop 12Animal welfarePork producerComments are closed.
|
Copyright © 2023